Thursday, March 01, 2007

Law and the Anguilla Revolution

When the Anguilla Revolution broke out in March 1967, Anguilla was a part of the Associated State of St Kitts, Nevis and Anguilla.  The legal system in effect at that moment was the common law of England and of the Associated State, as supplemented by the statutes enacted by the St Kitts House of Assembly.  Anguilla at that time was not only an integral part of the Associated State, but also shared in common institutions of the nine-country Associated States, and the world-wide Commonwealth of Nations headed by Queen Elizabeth II.  The common law of Anguilla was supplemented by laws and regulations made by the House of Assembly in St Kitts, to which Anguilla elected one representative.  The laws and regulations that applied in Anguilla in 1967 could all be looked up in one series of books.[1]  The ‘Laws of St Kitts Nevis and Anguilla’ contained all of the statutes that applied to Anguilla, save for a few passed by the House of Assembly in the intervening years before 1967.[2]
The 1967 Revolution.  The Anguilla Revolution was to fundamentally change Anguilla’s legal framework.  On 8 March 1967 Government House at Landsome Estate burned to the ground, and the St Kitts Warden fled to Basseterre.  On 29 May, at a meeting in Burroughs Park,[3] the crowd voted by a show of hands to expel the St Kitts policemen from the island.  They left the Park in procession.  They marched to Police Headquarters and ordered the St Kitts police stationed in Anguilla to leave by 10:00 the following morning.  On 30 May the officers were advised that a ‘plane was ready to take them to St Kitts.  They were all disarmed and expelled and sent back to St Kitts.  From that point on, all central government trappings as they had extended to Anguilla were brought to an end.  The St Kitts Magistrate was no longer permitted to visit Anguilla and to dispense justice in the Magistrate’s Court.  The High Court Judge from St Kitts was no longer permitted to visit and to hold court in Anguilla[4] as had occurred every year since 1825, the year when Anguilla had submitted to rule from St Kitts.  Only a limited number of laws passed by the legislature in St Kitts were ever to be applied to Anguilla again.[5]
On 31 May 1967, the Anguillians established a Peace-keeping Committee[6] to manage the island’s affairs.  This Committee and its successor Councils carried out all of the executive functions of government.  There was no attempt to set up a rival legislature to the St Kitts House of Assembly.[7]  The situation was not to change until the British Parliament passed the Anguilla Act of 1971 and made provision for the Commissioner to be able to make laws for the island.  The result was that no substantive laws were made in Anguilla until those made by the Commissioner the year 1971.  The first laws enacted by the House of Assembly of Anguilla were passed in the year 1976.
The first legal instrument of a sort to be passed in Anguilla after the Revolution began was the referendum on secession from St Kitts of 11 July 1967.[8]  A referendum not held under a governing statute is not strictly a law, but it may have legal implications and consequences, especially when it is acted on.  By this public act, Anguilla ceased for all time to be administered as a part of the Associated State.  A further step in legitimising the Revolution was the adoption of a Constitution.  The Peace-keeping Committee recruited Professor Roger Fisher[9] of Harvard University to help with its drafting.  He produced an eleven-section Constitution which provided for an Anguilla Council with full legislative and executive powers.  The members of the First Anguilla Council were named in the Constitution.[10]  They were to hold office until elections were held not later than July 1968.
The Peace-keeping Committee set about arranging the first elections under the new Fisher Constitution.  When nominations closed on nomination day, 17 October 1967, five of Ronald Webster’s candidates stood unopposed.  They were declared to be duly elected councillors.[11]  They took their seats as the Second Anguilla Council on 21 October.
In early 1968, the British sent an adviser, Tony Lee, to assist the Anguillians in running the island’s affairs.  He was to remain for a period of one year.  During this time, the British attempted to negotiate a settlement between the Anguillian and St Kitts leaders that would preserve the integrity of the Associate State.  They failed to resolve the crisis.  The Anguillians were adamant that they would accept nothing short of complete separation from St Kitts.  The Kittitians were equally adamant that the Revolution was illegal and that they would accept nothing short of the agreement of the Anguillians to return to the fold of the Associated State.  The British were caught in a quandary of their own making.  The West Indies Act of the UK Parliament of 1967[12] prohibited the UK government from imposing a solution.  The Act prohibited the UK from changing the status of any part of an Associated State without the request and consent of the State legislature.  On 30 July new elections were held for the Third Anguilla Council.[13]  Tony Lee left Anguilla on 6 January 1969 when the year was up.  Up to this point, no laws had been passed in or for Anguilla since the date of the commencement of the Revolution.
The next law to take effect in Anguilla was the 1969 Holcombe Constitution.  It was adopted by a show of hands in Burroughs Park on 6 February 1969.[14]  It provided for Anguilla to become an independent Republic.  There would be a President and a Vice President elected nationally.  There would also be an Assembly of nine legislators, two from each of the three constituencies and five elected at large.  The date set for elections to the legislature was 25 March 1969, while the President and Vice President were to be elected on 3 April.  When nominations closed on 21 February, Ronald Webster was nominated unopposed and was declared President of the Republic of Anguilla.[15]  On nomination day only six candidates were nominated, and they were similarly declared elected unopposed.[16]
Temporary British Administration.  On 11 March 1969, the British envoy William Whitlock who had arrived in Anguilla on a fact-finding mission was expelled.  During the early hours of 19 March 1969 some four hundred British paratroopers brought the Revolution to an end.  Their invasion of the island was not opposed, and not a person was harmed.  Tony Lee returned to govern the island as Commissioner under a British Order in Council of 18 March.[17]  The Holcombe Constitution was swept aside and the previous Third Anguilla Council was recognised as the duly elected representatives of the people.
With the change of government in London in 1971, the British administration gradually became more sympathetic to the Anguillian cause.  On 27 July 1971, the Anguilla Act of the British Parliament[18] came into effect.  It provided the framework under which the British would administer the island.  Shortly after, on 4 August, the 1971 Constitution[19] came into effect.  It provide for a Legislative Council of seven members and up to six nominated members.  No legislation was enacted in Anguilla during the year 1971.
In the early part of 1972 the first laws for Anguilla made in Anguilla were enacted under the provisions of the 1971 Constitution.  There were twenty-six laws in all, covering such matters as financial administration,[20] police,[21] council elections,[22] marriages,[23] courts,[24] and taxes.[25]  These laws were made by the Commissioner “after consultation with the Anguilla Council” but were not introduced into and debated in any legislative council in the normal way.  This was not a satisfactory state of affairs, and this early period was marked by disputes between the members of the Anguilla Council and the British Commissioner.[26]
The first general elections under the new Constitution were held on 24 July 1972.  The Fourth Anguilla Council that resulted found itself completely without any power.  Laws continued to be made by the Commissioner without reference to any legislative assembly.  Laws continued during 1973 to be made by Her Majesty’s Commissioner “after consultation with the Anguilla Council”.[27]  The situation remained unchanged during 1974 and 1975.  The Anguilla Council was continually unhappy with the arrangement that gave the Commissioner total power and control.  The result was a series of strikes and other civil unrest during the period of legislation by the Commissioner.
Modern Government Begins.  The turbulence was not to be calmed until the British agreed to constitutional reform, and the 1976 Anguilla Constitution[28] was made on 19 January and came into effect on 10 February 1976.  This provided for the first time for laws to be made by the Commissioner “with the advice and consent of the Assembly”.  Laws passed from this date were to be introduced into the Legislative Assembly, and assented to by the Commissioner.  These are laws as properly so understood.  They would have truly have been made with the consent of the representatives of the people.  The first such proper law to be made in Anguilla’s history by a legislative assembly turned out to be a humble and insignificant one, now long forgotten.  The Anguilla Fund and Financial Administration (Repeal) Ordinance, No 1 of 1976 did nothing more than bring back the old St Kitts Finance and Audit Ordinance of 1965 with such modifications as were necessary to bring it into conformity with the Constitution of Anguilla.  It was passed by the Legislative Assembly on 13 May 1976.  It commences with, what for a lawyer, are the magical words, “Enacted by the Legislature of Anguilla”.[29]  Modern constitutional government had at last come to Anguilla.
Originally written for the 40th Anniversary of the Anguilla Revolution Magazine Committee.



[1]     The 1964 Edition of the Revised Laws of St Christopher Nevis and Anguilla had just been published.
[2]     All of the laws and regulations of Anguilla would not be collected in one spot again until the Revised Edition of the Laws of Anguilla, 2000.
[3]     Later renamed the Ronald Webster Park.
[4]     From sometime in the 1930s the Assizes ceased to be held in Anguilla and serious Anguillian crimes were tried in St Kitts until the Anguilla Revolution:  Per Dame Bernice Lake QC in a private communication to the author.
[5]     The Anguilla (Administration) Order 1971, SI 1971 No 1235, section 15, provided that the statutes of the Associated State made prior to its commencement date of 4 August 1971 should have effect as laws of Anguilla.  From that date, any relevant and useful laws made in St Kitts after the date of the Revolution and prior to the commencement date were adopted with any necessary modifications as part of the law of Anguilla.  The ones that were not required were specifically repealed at various times in the following years.
[6]     The first members consisted of Walter Hodge as chairman, Peter Adams, Atlin Harrigan, Alfred Webster, James Baird, John Rogers, Clifford Rogers, Ronald Webster, Wallace Rey, Camile Connor, Phillip Lloyd, Charles Fleming, Wallace Richardson, Mac Connor, and Emile Gumbs.
[7]     Ronald Webster’s explanation to the author was that the members of the Committee were convinced that any laws passed by it would be illegal and unenforceable.  They functioned by persuasion, so that, for example, the customs officers at the ports agreed to collect duties at the revised rate of one half of the prescribed amounts.  The result was that there was no attempt to amend the customs duties law or any other law during the time of the Republic and until the Anguilla (Administration) Order of 1971 made provision for the Commissioner to make laws for Anguilla:  Per Ronald Webster in a private communication to the author.
[8]     Passed 1,813 to 5 in favour of secession.
[9]     Professor Fisher’s involvement grew out of his connection with Professor Leopold Kohr (1909-2004) who at the time was a lecturer at the University of Puerto Rico and who started a ‘state founding action’ to draw the world’s attention to the Anguilla crisis.
[10]    They were Rev Leonard Carty, Ronald Webster, John Rogers, Peter Adams, Walter Hodge, Emile Gumbs, and John Hodge.
[11]    They were Ronald Webster, Wallace Rey, Hugo Rey, Collins Hodge, and John Waddington ‘Waddie” Hodge.
[12]    The West Indies Act, 1967 (1967 c. 4).
[13]    This consisted of Ronald Webster, Atlin Harrigan, Kenneth Hazel, Collins Hodge, John Hodge, Wallace Rey, and Emile Gumbs.
[14]    By a margin of 1,739 to 4 votes.
[15]    He chose as his Vice President Campbell Fleming.  His Cabinet was to include John Webster, a former Secretary of Defence, as Secretary of State for Domestic Affairs, while Jeremiah Gumbs was Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
[16]    They were Winston Harrigan, Lucas Wilson, Uriel Sasso, James Woods, Charles Fleming, and Mac Connor.
[17]    The Anguilla (Temporary Provision) Order 1969, SI 1969 No 371.
[18]    The Anguilla Act 1971, (1971 c. 63)
[19]    The Anguilla (Administration) Order, 1971, SI 1971 No 1235.
[20]    The Anguilla Fund and Financial Administration Ordinance, No 1 of 1972.
[21]    The Anguilla Police Ordinance, No 3 of 1972.
[22]    The Anguilla Council Elections Ordinance, No 4 of 1972.
[23]    The Marriage Validation Ordinance, No 8 of 1972.
[24]    The Court of Appeal (Special Provisions) Ordinance, No 10 of 1972; and the Supreme Court (Amendment) Ordinance, No 26 of 1972.
[25]    The Rum Duty (Anguilla) (Amendment) Ordinance, No 13 of 1972; Boat Licensing (Amendment) Ordinance, No 14 of 1972; Liquor Licensing (Amendment) Ordinance, No 15 of 1972; Export Duty (Amendment) Ordinance, No 16 of 1972; Stamp Act (Amendment) Ordinance, No 18 of 1972; Vehicles and Road Traffic (Amendment) Ordinance, No 19 of 1972; Firearms (Amendment) Ordinance, No 20 of 1972; Public Pounds (Amendment) Ordinance, No 21 of 1972; Anguilla Airport (Embarkation) Tax Ordinance, No 24 of 1972.
[26]    First Tony Lee, who had to be replaced, then John Cumber, AC Watson, William Wallace, and later still in David Le Breton, who remained in place until after the 1976 Constitution came into effect.
[27]    There were eight such laws in all, including the Anguilla Roads Ordinance, No 5 of 1973; the Anguilla Local Constables Ordinance, No 6 of 1973; the Accommodation Tax Ordinance, No 7 of 1973; and the Telecommunication Ordinance, No 8 of 1973.
[28]    The Anguilla (Constitution) Order 1976, (SI 1976 No 50).
[29]    Let me in conclusion express my gratitude to Ms Navine Fleming-Kissob of the law chambers of Joyce Kentish & Associates who kindly made a desk and the necessary research material available for me to be able to write this article.

Friday, November 03, 2006

Anguilla Legal Aid Clinic Proposal to Government

ANGUILLA LEGAL AID CLINIC
PROJECT PROPOSAL
From: Don Mitchell CBE QC
To: The Department of Social Development, Anguilla
Date: 3 November 2006
1 Background Situation
There are many persons in Anguilla who for one reason or another are unable or reluctant to retain an attorney-at-law to assist them in securing their legal rights. This failure is often related to the cost, or the perceived cost, of those services. There is no government-sponsored legal aid programme to help persons who are unable to afford legal services. Many attorneys presently provide pro-bono advice and services on a private ad hoc basis to clients who are unable to pay the commercial cost of their time and assistance. There is no programme whereby such assistance is organized or documented.
2 Outline Proposal
The proposer, Don Mitchell CBE QC (hereinafter Mitchell), is a retired attorney and high court judge living in Anguilla. Mitchell proposes to assist the Department of Social Development (hereinafter the Department) to organize and provide a legal aid service to deserving members of the community. The proposal is that the Department will provide him with office space, limited administrative support, and he will attend at the Department and advise the Clients (hereinafter the Client) of the Department on three half-days a week. He will also make himself available outside of office hours to advise by telephone free of cost Clients of the Department who for one reason or another cannot make or keep an appointment. Mitchell has no present intention of limiting the services he will provide, eg, to one or two years. But, if the service is to have a guarantee of long life, other attorneys must be attracted to participate and to volunteer their time. Given that this is a new venture, and one cannot foresee the difficulties and problems that may arise, Mitchell is agreeable to the service being offered to the public on an experimental basis to start with, say for one month. If it proves to be popular, the Department may want to enter into a longer term arrangement. The service is to be called the ANGUILLA LEGAL AID CLINIC. The general outline of the service is as explained in the attached brochure, Appendix 1.
3 The Situation
Mitchell is a Queens Counsel and a retired judge. As such, there are limitations to the services that he can render personally. For example, as a QC he is not permitted by his oath to do solicitor’s work, ie, writing letters and settling legal documents. As an ex-judge he is prohibited for the present from appearing in a court of law as the legal representative of a litigant. He is limited to a consultancy role, ie, advising and counseling Clients. Someone else will have to be found to go to court and to provide other necessary legal services to deserving Clients.
4 The Solution
The solution is to have private attorneys do the actual legal work. At present, attorneys are accustomed to spend a substantial amount of their billable time doing free or subsidized legal work. It is anticipated that many of them will welcome[1] having some independent office screen out deserving welfare cases, and by prior agreement to deal with them knowing that they are deserving of free or subsidized legal services. Some of these attorneys will in time be encouraged to attend at the Clinic and to there advise and assist Clients of the Clinic.
5 The Roster
After approval of the Department for the project is obtained, one of the first steps will be to fill out the Roster. The Roster is in the attached form, Appendix 2. It lists every law firm on the island and the services which each attorney will be prepared to offer to Clients. Each attorney will be encouraged to complete and return to the Clinic an application to be rostered in the attached form, Appendix 3. This form when completed will provide the information needed for the Roster. It is this Roster that will ensure that the legal aid services are fairly distributed among the profession, and that undue advantage is not taken of a few attorneys.
6 Client Intake
Mitchell will provide most of the services offered directly by the Clinic, until other attorneys are recruited on a voluntary basis to assist him. He will need help from the Department’s staff. The first job is the completion of the Intake Form, a sample of which is at Appendix 4. When a Client who needs legal advice attends at the Clinic, someone will have to interview the Client and complete the Intake Form. This will give Mitchell all the information he needs to begin to assist the Client. The receptionist will keep the Legal Aid diary, and will give all appointments. During his first interview with the Client, Mitchell will take the detailed statement from the Client and collect all other documents[2] and information needed to perform the Clinic’s services. Mitchell proposes that a fee[3] of EC$10.00 be charged and paid by the Client before the Client is given an appointment to see[4] him.
7 Referral
Once the Client has been interviewed and Mitchell has determined that the Client has a need for legal services that he is not, as explained above, competent to perform, he will contact one of the participating law firms and refer the Client to the attorney in question. This is done by a Referral Letter in the form attached as Appendix 5. An important part of the referral process is Mitchell’s intervention in negotiating a fee that the Client is comfortable with paying, and making a note of it on the documentation. Another important part of the referral process is the agreement of the attorney to permit the Clinic to enquire from time to time[5] how the work in assisting the Clinic’s Client is progressing. The rules[6] that attorneys will follow will be in the form set out in Appendix 6.
8 Feedback/Assessment
Maintaining standards will be ensured by a two-pronged process. First, the Client will be encouraged to report back to the Clinic with an assessment of the services. This will be done in part by using the Client Feedback Form attached as Appendix 7. Additionally, the attorney assisting the Client will be required to give a Status Report from time to time to the Clinic in the form attached as Appendix 8.
9 Full Legal Aid
The proposed services fall far short of a full legal aid system. Such a system would involve government providing a fund out of which lawyers can be paid a reasonable fee to provide professional services to the most needy in the community. It is submitted that Anguilla is a long way from being able to afford such a service. The service that is being suggested in this proposal may be described as an interim or intermediate legal aid service.
10 Budget/Equipment/Personnel
Given that this proposed service will be offered free of charge and using existing facilities within the Department, it is difficult to prepare a budget. However, it may be useful to itemize here the furniture, staffing, and equipment that will be required. A rough draft is attached as Appendix 9.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[APPENDICES NOT INCLUDED]


[1]     Many hours are wasted in dealing with a client’s problem before it is realized that the client will never be able to afford to pay for them, and a decision often has to be made on an ad hoc basis to deal with the problem pro bono.
[2]     As regards documents, Mitchell proposes not to collect original documents, but only photo-copies or scanned or photographed copies.
[3]     As regards a fee or charge made by the Department, it is proposed that a nominal fee be charged. This is for two reasons. No person in Anguilla is so poor that a few dollars cannot be found for essentials. Second, it is a generally observed fact of human nature that whatever is free is undervalued. People only respect and value something that they have paid for in one way or another.
[4]     It will not be possible to charge a Client who telephones him for legal advice, and it is to be expected that there will be a significant number of telephone-only Clients once the service becomes more widely known. [It may be possible in due course to put in place an honour system for billing such persons.]
[5]     This monitoring and oversight will be essential for reassuring the illiterate Client and other welfare Clients who are insecure in dealing with professionals.
[6]     It is very likely that these rules will change and evolve over time as Mitchell negotiates with the Bar Association and as the Clinic and the attorneys grapple to deal with problem situations that cannot at present be envisaged or planned for.